| | | | | | | | | | |

Standard Steel vs Eazi-Access vs Anti-Ligature vs Secure+: Which Should You Specify?

Standard Steel vs Eazi-Access vs Anti-Ligature vs Secure+: Which Should You Specify?

If you’re specifying radiator covers for a project, choosing the right range is usually about three things:
environment, maintenance access and tamper resistance.

This guide gives you a simple decision path — so you can specify confidently and avoid the common issues (blocked TRVs, awkward servicing,
and covers that aren’t robust enough for the space).

Fast decision guide
Specifiers & Estates Teams
Free manufacturer survey available
Quick rule of thumb

If maintenance access is frequent → lean towards Eazi-Access.
If security / tamper is critical → specify Anti-Ligature or Secure+.
For general robust applications → Standard Steel.

Best practice

Manufacturer-led survey to confirm sizes, access needs and site constraints (free survey available).

Quick comparison (one-glance)

Range Best for Key spec focus
Standard Steel General robust installations Durability + tidy appearance
Eazi-Access Maintenance-heavy sites Servicing access strategy
Anti-Ligature Secure environments Tamper resistance intent
Secure+ Higher-risk secure environments Controlled access + robust security intent
Best practice: whichever range you specify, a manufacturer-led survey is the safest route to confirm sizes, cut-outs,
access requirements and site constraints before manufacture.

What to put in your tender notes (copy/paste)

Radiator covers: Supply and install bespoke radiator covers to each location as indicated.
Manufacturer to carry out a free site survey to confirm final sizes, cut-outs and access requirements prior to manufacture.
Sizes recorded as H × W × D in mm. Finish: powder coated to RAL ___.
Fixings and access strategy to suit wall type, environment and maintenance needs.
Where secure environments apply, specify Anti-Ligature or Anti-Ligature Secure+ as required, including controlled access and tamper-resistant fixings.